Verified that big muff :) . Sound”s great 👍. But for the D1-D4 I put BAT83 instead of 1N6263... but I don’t know if with 1N6263 sounds much better ..... great job . Thanx
It would be great to display the exact version number... What guitarfxlayouts have of this 2000-2008 version is "EC3003-C", aka "REV_C".... which means 2008... according to Kit Rea's infos: http://www.kitrae.net/music/big_muff_history3.html
yours is, I guess, either the original EC3003 or EC3003 REV_A
But this is not supposed to be a correction whatsoever!! :) It's just that knowing the exact version somehow makes us feel better
I truly admire your work, including its wild dynamism! -- productivity :) :)
My guess is that it's an EC-3003, no revision. It's definitely not a Rev. C; I don't know exactly what's different about Rev. B; but I have a Rev. A, and the only difference between that and this layout is that the input resistor is 39k and the pull-down resistor is 2M2. Apart from that, they're identical.
Verified that big muff :) . Sound”s great 👍. But for the D1-D4 I put BAT83 instead of 1N6263... but I don’t know if with 1N6263 sounds much better ..... great job . Thanx
ReplyDeleteIt would be great to display the exact version number...
ReplyDeleteWhat guitarfxlayouts have of this 2000-2008 version is
"EC3003-C", aka "REV_C"....
which means 2008...
according to Kit Rea's infos:
http://www.kitrae.net/music/big_muff_history3.html
yours is, I guess, either the original EC3003 or EC3003 REV_A
But this is not supposed to be a correction whatsoever!! :)
It's just that knowing the exact version somehow makes us feel better
I truly admire your work, including its wild dynamism! -- productivity :) :)
My guess is that it's an EC-3003, no revision. It's definitely not a Rev. C; I don't know exactly what's different about Rev. B; but I have a Rev. A, and the only difference between that and this layout is that the input resistor is 39k and the pull-down resistor is 2M2. Apart from that, they're identical.
Delete