Monday 4 November 2019

Revv G3 Pedal



47 comments:

  1. Awesome many thanks! Any knowledge of this having the feedback/oscollation issues that plagued the pedalpcb layout?
    Also, is there somewhere that requests would be able to be asked as opposed to on layout threads?
    Tbh maybe some updated wampler layouts would be awesome. And the jfet ones desperatly need trimmers (tagboard stc)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just finished and it quiter than Friedman BE-OD and Dirty Shirley but it is still some squeal with Treble, Mid and Volume knobs turned clockwise.

      So which Wampler layouts do you have in mind?

      Delete
  2. Oh, I had no idea PedalPCB's board had noise issues. I know an earlier layout that I did had some squeal problems so I decided to draw a new one from scratch to see if the noise could be tamed.
    I haven't tried it myself but people have reported that a small buffer daughterboard infront cured the worst noise....

    Yeah, I'll eventually start up a request section soon and thanks for the the heads up on the J FET Wampler circuits. I'll definitely look up those.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that the layout, in some distortion circuit, has a important part about oscillation issue.
      I had built twice a Rat with multi-clippping option on veroboard with any issue. Once I decided to build a stock version on a different layout, but I got a bad oscillation in some settings. So I taken out the components and used them on a multi-clipping layout but just with one clipping option and it worked ok.

      With your G3 layout did you use shielded wire for input and output jacks? Is it into the box?

      Delete
    2. Yes I've experienced the same issue with some Rat layouts. It seems that the trick is to avoid having signals crossin each other or have them a few strips in between. It is easier said than done when it comes to larger and more complex circuits like Revv. It is almost impossible get an optimal layout on stripboard (regarding noise)but you can at least try to draw the the layout to keep the noise at minimum.

      No shielded cables in my build and it is not boxed yet. Had to choose between this and Revv 4 for housing and I prefered the latter.

      Delete
    3. Ok.
      It might be good try to make the G3 work into the box, but I understand if you don't want to mess up with your builts. :)

      I don't remember if somebody tried to add the extra stage of the G3 on a verified G4 layout. It's not the more neat solution, indeed I don't like to add extra board, like the buffer in front. But, if it is the only way to make the pedal work fine... ok.

      Delete
  3. Did someone finish the schematic?? Why there isn't a layout full Verified without any problems like less gain and oscillation and stuff??):

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Layout above is verified.

      Delete
    2. But, as you said before, it has some oscillation issue at some extreme settings.
      (I didn't built it.)

      Delete
    3. Yeah, but not noiser than Friedman BE-OD or Dirty Shirley for example when unboxed.

      Delete
    4. So this layout acting exactly the same as an original Revv g3(unboxed)? And when I put that in a box it will have no self oscillation and swirling and stuff?

      Delete
    5. I guess fuzzhead meant that this G3 (I think the same of the original) unboxed is not noiser than Friedman BE-OD or Dirty Shirley, but has the oscillations issue.
      I don't know if someone has tried it into the box. Maybe can help to use shielded wire for input and output wires from the jacks to the footswitch.

      Delete
    6. So why its verfied?? The original revv g3 doesn't have oscillation in extreme settings...

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because it matches the schematic Bugg posted at PedalPCB which is traced by himself from a real Revv 3. Remember that a vero layout is more likely to cause noise (especially in high part coounts and high gain circuits) than a well made multi layer PCB layout. It is simply the naure of the beast. As Eliah Bailey said, shielded cables might help as well as shielding from the box.

      Or you could draw an own PCB layout to completely reduce the noise but it is over my paygrade and not what I'm really into.

      Delete
    2. Ok thank! I think im gonna build this on 2 layer pcb to reduce noise(:

      Delete


    3. Simple but interesting modification:omit clipping leds & diodes or select with switch.

      Delete
    4. Great sound:ic1-Tlo62 ic2-Tl072 ic3-TL2074cn

      Delete
    5. Thanks for the tricks. Did you already try the clipping switch? Did you find some noise/oscillation/squeal problem with this layout?

      Delete
  5. capacitor 22n is replaced by resistor 4k7. Pin 1 of IC2 for capacitor 22n for resistor 4k7 for D1 and D2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello, ARONDIY.
      If you are saying that 22nF and 4k7 are inverted I guess it doesn't make any difference.
      But if you are building it I think you can try to put some sockets and see what really happen if you invert it.

      Delete
    2. that's what I meant :) it made a difference to me, the signal flowed better. Before it seemed that there was a noise gate killing the signal.
      sorry, i'm using google translator.

      Delete
  6. Hi Elijah. Sorry if i answer you late , but i've been busy on other layouts :no last Xotic Soul Driven posted from Fuzzhead. I omitted both the diodes and the led, as the saturation seemed more natural and harmonic to mee.This also applies to G2 and G4.
    I confirm the use of ic1-TL062,ic2-TL072, ic3-tl2074.I did not find it'hissing or screeching and i did not use shielded cables.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, thanks!
      No oscillation? You could be one of the few lucky. Unless you're using it after a buffer. Because it helps to solve this issue that some high gain distortion DIY has.

      Delete
    2. Hi Elijah.Even with maximum gain i have no oscillation and no buffer use.I think this is due to the use of TL062 and TL2074,which by reducing the signal a little,make, in my opinion,more pleasant the distortion without oscillation and with low noise.

      Delete
  7. figured id throw my 2 cents in the pile having just built one...

    i used tl072s and a tl074 from tayda with no problems, built as layout shown with no modification required.

    i had no noise/oscillation/squeal issues with this layout. didnt even try shielded cable. having dealt with those issues in the past on similar high gain pre-amp/distortion pedals, such as a BE-OD or VH4, i have learned that keeping wire-length to a minimum can help with such issues. im guessing thats what saved me if others are indeed experiencing those issues with this layout.

    noobery aside, this thing rocks. solid layout.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Build a G4 layout without any issue, thanks for that's great job; finish G3 and only have squeal on Red channal, suppress Gain/Treble can help, or something I can do like shielding or upper filtering maybe.. thanks again the great layout, and share my clips here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNPKNl5Jx5Q

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is fantastic! thanks for sharing.
    Built with zero issues. No noise. No oscillation. As quiet as any overdrive. Not sure what all the fuss is about... Great layout.
    https://youtube.com/shorts/q-9QErn21-Q

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sickest distortion pedal I've played thru. Thank you for the layout, oscillated like crazy, but nothing a buffer can't solve. Also used lm324, but I don't think it would make a big difference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. scratch that. I took out the buffer and now it doesn't even oscillate at max settings without a buffer. wtf

      Delete
    2. Ok. Did you play with it stand alone? Or it's in the pedalboard in front of some buffered pedal?
      Does the buffer place outside of the pedal? If it was inside and now you took out maybe the position of the wires made the difference?

      Anyway, good for you.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Mostly been playing through it "standalone", I haven't even boxed it up yet as I wanna try it with higher voltages. Placed the buffer before the revv. I tried 2 buffers: JHS Lil black buffer, second one is just a basic JFET buffer from fxlayouts, anyways they both seem to work fine as of now.
      Yeah, maybe the position of the wires meant something.

      Haz a nice day Elijah-Baley!

      Delete
  12. This circuit really is something. It has more than enough of everything without becoming overly fizzy. Very appropriate for a sort of modern version of that 80's Thrash thing. At least that's what I hear. I would love another high gain suggestion if anyone has one. Any suggestions for something equally crunchy but with a bit more "character" while retaining the amp-like character????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DOD Corrosion for full on hair or the Face Melter

      Delete
    2. Along the same lines of the Revv series - I quite liked the Engl Powerball.

      Delete
    3. Nice. I'll try them both.

      Delete
    4. Totally agree on checking out the Revv series. ENGL 3 is really good as well. And Amptweaker Tight Metal.

      Delete
  13. I've counted and recounted again and I'm getting 22 links, taking the double link to be 2 links...totally insignificant but might save someone else a few mins

    ReplyDelete
  14. can i build revv g3 using old layout (2 tl072 ics)?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hey guys, I just finished this and mine doesn't work. I used an audio probe and found that ic2 is acting very weird. The LEDs don't light up, there's continuity between 9v and pins 5,6,7 and 8 (pin 8 is supposed to be 9v so that's not a problem), the signal coming out of pin 1 is very noisy and right after the 4.7k resistor it is connected to the signal is very weak almost inaudible. There is also continuity between 9v and pin 7 of IC1. Can anyone help me out?
    Here are the voltages of the ics:
    IC1:
    1: 4.6v 8: 8.7v
    2: 4.6v 7: 4.4v
    3: 2.9v 6: 3.8v
    4: 0 5: 4.2v

    IC2:
    1: 4.4v 8: 8.6v
    2: 4.4v 7: 4.3v
    3: 4.4v 6: 4.3v
    4: 0 5: 4.3v

    IC3:
    1: 4.3v 14: 4.3
    2: 4.3v 13: 4.3v
    3: 4.3v 12: 4v
    4: 8.6v 11: 0
    5: 4.3v 10: 2.9v
    6: 4.3v 9: 4.3v
    7: 4.3v 8: 4.3v

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Checked for bridges everything looks fine. The continuity thing only happens when the the board is powered

      Delete
    3. When I can't get something to work I've learned to push it aside and look at it with fresh eyes. Usually it's a misplaced lead somewhere. The layout does work. It's a pretty big one. If you can post a pic maybe I can find it.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete