Thursday 17 December 2020

Death by Audio Absolute Destruction

 A transatralntic trace by Enrico, AlexS and fuzzhead. 

A big thanks goes to Enrico for letting us trace his pedal, all the images and the schematic.

The layout is tested and verified. There is some odd parts in there which can easily be subbed for other values. (221ohm to 220 ohm and 4,64k to 4,7k). MPSA05G transistors isn't that common but MPSA06 which is more widely avaiable works fine and is almost identical spec wise.

Also, Overload is linear, not log as in the first posted layout.

 


 
 









55 comments:

  1. Awesome!! Thanks all three for making it available for DIY'ers. Now we're only missing Waveform Destroyer:D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right!! saw the limited Exit Index and Pinned fuzz pop locally, had half of mind to buy 'em to trace 'em. Alas, they were sold.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was curious about the Exit Index too.

      Delete
  3. Hey Guys, built this up today and it works but it's nowhere near the production model. It gets a little bit crazy but nothing like the original.

    Having no MPSA05Gs, I tried 2N3904s as per the notes. Only have LM386N-1. Would having a 386D make any difference?
    It seems like it need way more gain or something.
    Also Gain pots need to be reversed. All else is sweet. Cheers for the layout!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there. Ok, 2N3904 might not work as good as I stated. Those reverse beta gain stages can be very sensitive to which transistors you are using. I was using MPSA06 which is widely avaiable in my area and I has plenty of gain on tap. I was using LM386-1 so the power amp don't seems to be the culprit.
      Are you sure about the gain pot being reversed? Mine works as with more gain clockwise. The Overload control needs to be reversed, indeed. I'll fix it.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the reply fuzzhead! I'll try a few more different transistors while I wait for some MPSA06 to come in. I'll have to check the gain pot again. I may have just wired it the wrong way and not realised. Cheers!

      Delete
    3. Gain is the right way round, it was the Overload control that I was meaning.
      I've tried a pair of BC548s and it now seems a lot closer to the original.
      I did neglect to mention that I'm using 4.7v Zeners as that's the closest I had. Just tested it again and it seems the gain pot is doing nothing. There's plenty of gain but the pot has no effect on its level. Weird!
      I have a switch between pins 1 & 8 of the 386, I'll remove it and see if that makes a difference before changing the pot.

      Delete
    4. Ok, it seems that the BC548s had too much gain, negating the gain pot(even if that's possible, haha). Tried some 5089s(just over 500Hfe, I think) and they are perfect! Gain pot works nicely. Also tried a pair of BC109s and they were a little low, giving a dull sounding tone at min gain.
      The only thing I'm not getting is the octave up tone at 12 on the Overload control. I'm guessing that's due to the 4.7v Z in D1 & D2.

      Delete
  4. I'm always happy to see more DBA layouts, it's my favorite pedal company for sure! And this website is quickly becoming my favorite, so thanks a bunch Fuzzhead!
    I just built it with MPSA06G, LM386 and all linear pots. There is a low droning noise when gain is set anywhere other than minimum. Sounds like lower octave-ish noise that occurs when my big muff clone feeds back to itself. I'm not sure if it's a quirk of the pedal or my sloppy build. Can anyone tell me if this happens in their builds? I get the "blooming" effect with the overload pot, it's pretty unique and nice but that low noise drives me crazy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there! Thanks for your kind words.
      It seems that you have a build error somewhere, sounds as you wrote, a feedback issue. Have you knifed the gaps and cuts, triple checked everything, checked solder joints etc. ?
      Does the noise change frequencies when turning any of the pots?
      Do you get octave up with the Overload pot at noon?

      Delete
    2. thanks for the quick reply! I knifed the gaps, tried some new pots with crocodile cables but to no luck. Somehow when I replaced the battery, the issue was solved. Weird. maybe I accidentally moved a croc cable to a better connection.
      but now, I don't get the swell effect with both knobs at max. it just gets octave up-ish like the original pedal gets around noon but no crazy glitching effects even when it's full. that's also weird :D

      Delete
    3. oh, the overload pot isn't backwards. I saved the image the day it was posted so I used that as a reference. I guess that should be the issue, but why it occured after my first problem was solved is still a mystery to me :D

      Delete
    4. Nope, didn't help :( any idea why?

      Delete
    5. Try a differnt Lm386 and/or higher gain transistors like 2N5088?

      Delete
  5. Just finished mine and it works great. Like most DBA stuff, it’s very sensitive to which Transistors you use. I tried many and ended up with a pair of 2n5088s around 380hfe. For fun, try reversing one or both the trannies for crazy bonus sounds. I also used an lm386. My 1mb gain pot jumps hard from 0 to 2, then nothing from 2 to 10. A different taper might help. Cool build!

    ReplyDelete
  6. i have (built) this one: Seppuku Space Fuzz
    https://imgur.com/a/EsEAzM4

    ReplyDelete
  7. How would a 4.7v or even a 9.1v Zener diode affect this build?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. D3 and D4 is hard clippers to ground so I think you can use 4,7 zeners there. D1 and D2 is a bit more tricky since they affect the the Overload control and octave up. 4,7v Z might work but I wouldn't bet my money on it since it is a DBA design after all....

      Delete
  8. Made it too now. Used MPSA06's and a LM386. Glad I had a frw 3,6 zeners from my a Space Ring build. Works great - reminds me a bit of Fairfield Unpleasant Surprise when the Overload is engaged.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I built it today. Sounds truly disgusting. Thought exactly the same thing about it sounding like the Unpleasant Surprise.

      Delete
  9. Just checking on orientation of D2...cathode facing north, yes?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello again! I've replaced the diodes with 3.6v ones and the tone is pretty spot on! The only thing now is the amount of gain. Mine doesn't seem to have as much gain as the original. Got some MPAS06 and they don't seem to work. I have some MPSA05 on the way.
    I just happen to find one MPSA05 in my stash and the circuit only really works well if it is in the 2nd position. Swap them around and it's really full sounding with no gain!
    I'll check over my board and connections again but I'm quite confident that it's all good.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Question... do those caps have to be ceramic? Or would film box caps work just fine? I know that ceramic caps can have certain characteristics that might be desirable here. Thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, they don't have too. I used WIMA film caps in my build. Multilayer caps was used in the unit we traced. So both works. I bet the audiable difference would be neglible in this type of circuit.
      But that's just mine opinion...

      Delete
  12. Also, looking at the tagboard, it seems like you have the 2n5817 inline protection diode, but the schematic shows a 1n4001 from + to gnd for protection. Not a big difference, but there might be some confusion if people are not familiar with both methods of protection.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Looking at the schematic posted and the tagboard, should the 4.7uF and 100uF in the top right part of the board be switched? That 100uF there connected to pin 5 of the IC is supposed to be 4.7uF according to the schematic. And the cap attached from pin 7 to ground is supposed to be 100uF.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a some typos in the schematic. I'll try to swap the caps later today. The layout refelcts the actual trace.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the feedback. Please update once you fix the schematic. I will note that on my end for now. I am working on a PCB layout for this.

      Delete
    3. Ok, schematic updated. I don't have access to the first schematic since I didn't draw it put I made my own version during our trace session. It doesn't look as professional as the old one but at leats the cap values are now correct.

      Ps.
      Would love to see how your PCB turns out.:-)

      Delete
    4. Hi ! Did you try that PCB ? Would love to get one !

      Delete
  14. Looking at your new schematic, there seems to be a discrepancy around the Overload pot. On the old schematic (and the perf layout), the 100Nf cap from the emitter of Q2 and pin 2 of the Gain pot goes to pin 3 of the Overload pot and the junction of D1 and D2. On the new schematic, it goes just to the junction of D1 and D2, and pin 3 of the Overload pot is connected to the emitter of Q2 and pin 2 of the Gain pot. I drew up the differences on a jpeg file, but am not sure how to share a picture with you. Hope my description makes sense. If the board is correct, then the new schematic has an error. Trying to make sure I get this right for the PCB layout. Almost done that, BTW.

    ReplyDelete
  15. https://imgur.com/p1x50yf Actually, there you go. That is the issue. Have a look. The old schematic matched the vero board, but the new one needs to be changed as per the purple line. Unless I am missing something. Please confirm.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Another question, if you will... that first schematic that was posted noted all ceramic caps other than the electros. Is that correct? Looking at the 220pf, it is sized for a ceramic disk, but the other caps look like film caps in your drawing. Do you think ceramic is necessary for this build or would box film caps work just find, likely?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, spotted. Now fixed:-)
      For the cap types. Yes, all cap except for the electrolyctic were MLCC with 5mm pin spacing except for the 220pF. I guess you could use cermapics or film without much or any audible difference.

      Delete
    2. Looks like you still need to take out the connection from Gain 2 to Overload 3 on the schematic.

      What is the best way to share the PCB layout with you?

      Delete
    3. Ooop:-/ Now that is fixed as well.
      You can send the PCB layout to this e mail address.
      anders.sjodal at gmail.com

      Delete
  17. Success! I used MPSA06 in Q1 and 2N5088 in Q2. My PCB layout with board mounted pots was a success. I get all the wicked blooming and cutting out of the signal with the Overload adjustment. The only change I would implement is switching the Overload leads for a more intuitive rotary pot adjustment. As is, it works as the sliders to, with the overload going backwards or to the left.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi everyone, anyone finaly made a PCB out of this ? Thanks !

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have etched and proven my layout.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Here's mine...

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/tDPDBHubdrHLesy39

    https://youtu.be/z5DzlBaGqm0

    ReplyDelete
  21. I had none of the right parts for this circuit but went ahead anyway. I used 5088's and 5.1v zeners as I was out 3.6v. Sounds as it should. THNX!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ya know when you don't feel totally satisfied for no real reason? For fun I stuck a 2kb pot on the power and starved the circuit a little. I'm getting Lo-Fi square wave as well as some down octave and even a little asymmetrical tremolo (I found it twice, so it's not a weird phenom.). Starving the power just a hair also gives a slightly sweeter sound when you want it. All the pots are interacting nicely. I also changed the Fuzz pot to a 500ka and the Overload function I changed to a 1mc. I liked the circuit as it was but now it has a touch of Dwarfcraft for flavor. Worth a try. Thanks again

    ReplyDelete
  23. Turn this into an Evil Fuzz by changing the Gain pot to a trimmer and the overload pot to an on/on switch (spdt will do) with a 250K resistor on one side, and an 820K on the other.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Interesting. I may try that. The circuit is sitting on my couch.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I built it, fire it up first time and it works
    And I make the enclosure like cabinet amp to make it cooler,
    Sounds a bit ring modish,
    pretty fun to play
    Thank you fuzzhead🙏🙏

    https://youtu.be/tg-KsTPTA7g

    ReplyDelete
  26. Built it but somethings not right. Sounds like a wet fart and the sound is gated for the 1st couple seconds before it comes out. I was super careful with the build, so I'm really not sure. The diodes I used were a different part number (1N270?) but they're still 3.6v Zeners. It my 1st attempt at a DBA pedal, which I read are notoriously difficult to get sounding right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've built this one from this drawing (including all of the edits from various other posters on this) and it worked, pretty much sounding like the demos on youtube. The odd resistor values may or may not be critical - 910k is common in A LOT of DBA circuits so I would say that super precise resistance may not be critical... but I could be wrong? I always use sockets, but they 110% necessary with DBA designs. Some transistors just won't work - so be prepared to try a bunch of different ones. Also, I'm sorry about the aqueous flatulence.

      Delete
    2. also - aren't 1n270 diodes germanium, as opposed to zener diodes?

      Delete
  27. Only thing that's different is for the 910k resistor, i put a 550k and 330k in series which came to 880k.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Can anyone help with the footswitch connections?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check this for your wiring

      https://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/2012/02/offboard-wiring.html

      Delete
  29. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I must have done something wrong. The pedal works but is not nearly as wild as I thought. Its at best a sort of gnarly fuzz. I dont know where I might have gone wrong.

    ReplyDelete